allow <user, opt.> field on {requirerole:}, {denyrole:} etc.#38

we should be able to combine (is that the word for it?) more commands together:

an example:
1.) with {requirearg:1|user} so like: {requirerole:@role|[$1]} and mimu will be able to see if that person has a role before the AR works so if they get mentioned, that AR will not go thru:

ie: .steal @user
then error: insufficient role: user mentioned must have @role

or {requirebal:5000|[$1]} ; {denyrole:@role|$1]}
then error: user mentioned must have a certain # of bal etc etc

-if we can use [$1] with other variables then i think we should be able to for those above as well!

2.) an option to {modifybal:} have a [modifybal] ?

• so with this, we can combine it with {choose} and it’ll only change the balance depending on the reply.

ie: {choose:you earn 500 [modifybal:500]|you lose 500 [modifybal:-500]}
right now: my way around this is just using chooses & repeatedly redisplaying lockedchooses. right now, it works so its not that big of a deal but i think it’ll be nice if {modifybal} had a [] option as well.

either that or increase {choose} commands pls

ps: sorry ; didnt realize someone already suggested in #9 . this is duplicate suggestion

you can reuse choose like lockedchoose, but yes this is a nice idea

“either that or increase {choose} commands pls”

marking as planned + renamed sugg to be clearer. but idk if {user_avatar:[$1]} will work